[Marxistindia] SC Order on Farm Laws - People's Democracy Editorial

news from the cpi(m) marxistindia at cpim.org
Wed Jan 13 15:22:34 IST 2021


January 13, 2021

Press Release

We are releasing herewith the editorial appearing in the forthcoming  
issue of People’s Democracy.


For CPI(M) Central Committee Office

***


An Ill-Conceived Order

The order of the Supreme Court on the three farm laws and the farmers  
struggle against them is ill-conceived and one-sided.

The three-member bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde has stayed  
the implementation of the three farm laws until further orders. This  
has misled some sections to hail the intervention of the Supreme  
Court. Actually, the stay is not linked to any further hearing on the  
substantive issues raised in the petitions or by the farmers in the  
struggle. It is linked to the setting up of an “expert committee”  
which has been directed to submit its report in two months’ time.

None of the petitioners had asked for the committee. Moreover, the  
farmers representatives had already in talks with the government  
rejected the offer of a committee.

The Court has appointed four persons to the committee who are all  
known for their support to the three farm laws. One of them, Ashok  
Gulati has been a leading exponent of neo-liberal policies in  
agriculture. It almost seems that the Court had relied on the  
government to nominate the experts for the committee. The two farmers’  
representatives on the panel are also supporters of the farm laws. The  
Court did not deem it fit to consult the farmers organisations about  
who should represent them in the committee.

The report of such a committee is preordained. After two months when  
the report is submitted to the Court, it is inevitable that the Court  
will accept the recommendations of its own committee and the stay on  
the implementation will end.

The order concludes by stating that “While we may not stifle a  
peaceful protest, we think that this extraordinary order of stay of  
implementation of the farm laws will be perceived as an achievement of  
the purpose of such protest at least for the present and will  
encourage the farmers bodies to convince their members to get back to  
their livelihood, both in order to protect their own lives and health  
and in order to protect the lives and properties of others”.

Thus, the Court has made it clear, that this order is sufficient for  
the farmers to give up their protest and go home. During the trial,  
the Attorney General made the extraordinary assertion that Khalistani  
elements have infiltrated the movement. The Court responded by asking  
him to file an affidavit with the details and thus brought it on board.

Given the Court’s attitude, the government can take it as a cue to  
move against the protesters and to suppress the struggle on the plea  
that “anti-national khalistani elements” are active in the struggle.

The farmers organisations have rightly rejected the “expert committee”  
set up by the Court and reiterated their resolve to continue the  
struggle for the repeal of the laws. The coming days are going to be  
crucial for the struggle and all democratic forces must mobilise in  
full support and solidarity.





More information about the Marxistindia mailing list